Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Pop Culture in La Dolce Vita: A low brow examination of a high browfilm (A critique)



           Part of films ephemeral quality is that its meaning changes with the each observer and as that individual observer changes, evolves, age, their interpretation of the art may also change. Pop culture and meta references in La Dolce Vita (1960) get lost among the over reading and analysis as a piece of art. La Dolce Vita (1960) is one of the most important films by one of the most important directors (I’m not sure but I’m pretty sure I stole that from the back of the Criterion Collection box) so the academic and critical analysis of the film is certainly warranted and I will in no way try to argue against that. Yes La Dolce Vita (1960) is high art but let’s not be so precious that we don’t take notice that Nico having a cameo as Nico is completely pop and delightful. Nico rose to fame as a Warhol Superstar during the 1960s. Contemporary audiences due to time, place, and other factors that add context may miss some of the references, tips of the cap, and winks at the camera a 1960 audience would of immediately caught.
          The casting of Lex Barker as Sylvia’s drunken fiancé in La Dolce Vita (1960) is superb. He is a caricature yet utterly believable as the drunken American oaf. A difference in a 2015 screening from a 1960 screening of the film is many contemporary viewers will not remember Lex Barker as the matinee idol who played Tarzan five times. A contemporary example would be to have Chris Hemsworth the actor who portrays the Norse god Thor in the cinematic adaptation of the Marvel universe. To a certain demographic of the audience in 1960 they would immediately recognize their favorite loincloth wearing, vine swinging, king of the jungle, Tarzan starring in one of the film’s vignettes. The casting of this role is one of many examples of the merger of pop culture, high art, and craftsmanship that permeate La Dolce Vita (1960).
          Nino Rota scored many of Fellini’s films and was a long time collaborator. Nino Rota is also noted for scoring The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather Part II (1974). Nino Rota will forever be immortalized as the composer of The Godfather Waltz. La Dolce Vita (1960) has Rota and Fellini collaborating again. Rota’s score can be heard in the opening and conclusion of the film but the majority of the film uses a pop music soundtrack. The song Patricia by Perez Prado is featured prominently in the film. Billboard ranked Patricia as the #5 song of 1958 and it hit #1 on the billboard charts that same year. Patricia continues to be part of the zeitgeist being used in shows like The Simpsons and HBO’s Real Sex. A contemporary audience may hear Patricia and think it’s ironic, whimsical, or nostalgic. In 1960 this soundtrack was the height of pop culture. At the end of the film as in the beginning the pop soundtrack is replaced by the score. During the string of decedent evenings a fun pop soundtrack is used in the film allowing the viewer to get lost in the charisma of the actors but once the score replaces the soundtrack the viewer knows the dream the party and or dream are over. The pop soundtrack ends just as Marcello’s ambition to be a serious writer ends and Rota’s score begins again book ending the film.
          La Dolce Vita (1960) lampoons the vapid drunken nights of café culture in Rome yet it can’t help being immersed and celebrating what it’s deriding. It’s like stockbrokers who love to watch Wall Street (1987) or criminals who glorify Scarface (1983). All three afore mentioned films are completely self aware that what they are showing you is nothing to be emulated, yet all three are films whose heightened stylized worlds are something audiences fall in love with and glorify. Fellini tells you it’s an empty life yet audiences can’t help but be enraptured by celebrity, sex, fancy clothes, and all the trapping of modern café culture in Rome. Sylvia’s character is a metaphor for the themes of the film. She is shallow and impetuous but she is so sexy you understand why everyone puts up with her nonsense. Fellini represents café culture the same way. It’s vapid and meaningless yet it’s so sexy and decedent it’s hard to resist.
          Nico was a model, anti-Semite, actress, and musician most famous for her collaborations with Andy Warhol and The Velvet Underground. In La Dolce Vita (1960) Nico has a cameo playing herself. Fellini was not only the film’s director but also co-writer and created the part specifically for her. Marcello is a gossip journalist in a chic European city why wouldn’t he know Nico? But isn’t Nico a real person and the movie a work of fiction? This is another example of Fellini using pop culture to create his universe. If Nico is a real person and if she appears in the movie does that make the movie real life or make real life a movie? Something seemingly innocuous like a cameo of a pop star suddenly adds to the surreal quality of the seemingly endless string of decedent evenings followed by repentant dawns.  
          Fellini is one of cinema’s most acclaimed directors. When discussing the great auteur directors Fellini’s name is always mentioned. La Dolce Vita (1960) is such a dense film it can literally be broken down frame by frame and I’m sure it has been by scholars and critics alike. La Dolce Vita (1960) seamlessly synthesizes pop culture in a manner not many films that are considered high art have accomplished. Fellini’s use of pop culture doesn’t diminish his art he uses it to enhance his art. For me this hits a real nostalgic sweet spot. I first began to appreciate film not just as escapism but as an art form during the rise of American independent film during the early to mid 1990’s. Many of the writer directors of that era most notably Quentin Tarantino create a heightened  stylized world peppered with pop culture references to ground their fictionalized universes in realism. It creates a soft focus reflection of our own world where the women are prettier, the dialogue is slicker, and the life is sweeter. 
 By
J. Scott Cohen




Saturday, May 9, 2015

The Cobbler (2014) review


      When I was watching The Cobbler (2014) I felt like I was watching three or four different films. One of the things I look for when watching a film is, what is the film trying to achieve? How and what is it trying to say? Adam Sandler and Ellen Barkin try their best but it’s hard to know what performance to give when the director doesn’t know the film they want to make. Is this film a dark comedy or light hearted fairy tale? I don’t know and neither does the film. The movie shifts tones blindly as it bounds haphazardly down the road.
      The film has a few nice moments and some clever camera movements but unfortunately these are only flashes of competency. If you’re in the mood for either comedy or an Adam Sandler film there are numerous superior alternatives available.  



2 out 5 high heels








Thursday, May 7, 2015

The Zero Theorem (2013) review

               The production design and camera work screamed Terry Gilliam. For me that is certainly a good thing. Gilliam’s distinct style is still refreshing after over three decades of making feature length films. This may speak to the staleness of voices in cinema but it’s hard to chastise studios for not taking chances on films with a unique voice after the less then lukewarm reception The Zero Theorem (2013) received in America. I couldn’t help but think of Cloud Atlas (2012) as I watched The Zero Theorem (2012) but not because of similarities the films share. After sharing the genre of science fiction the similarities end for the two films. The reason Cloud Atlas (2012) kept coming to mind was because of the tepid reception that film received as well. Both are science fiction films with epic and detailed production design and high minded ideas and themes. Despite the huge success of lighter science fiction films like Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) and Star Wars (1977) hard science fiction is stagnant. J.J. Abrams re-boot of Star Trek (2009) is a great example of this paradigm. By taking much of the “Star Trek” out of Star Trek and adding more adventure elements he made the franchise more palatable to a wider audience. The Big Bang Theory Principle is in effect or the Inverse Simpsons’ principle. People feel smart when they watch dumb shows about smart people. The Simpsons will take seemingly dumb ideas and make intelligent points while the Big Bang Theory take smart concepts like physics and use them as plot points for stale sitcom high jinks.
                Even though some of the CGI was obvious it didn’t detract from the film because the CGI was still detailed and interesting to look at. Zero Theorem has plenty of Brazil (1985) DNA and I am certainly not the first one to mention this. In many ways The Zero Theorem (2013) is not just commenting on our culture or its direction but Z.T. is taking the social/political ideas of Brazil and expanding on those ideas with metaphysical/theological themes. The paradox of this film is its very blunt and loud with its message and themes and at the same time ambiguous. The production design is similar in this way. The future created is something we have seen before but because of the attention to detail there is so much to absorb from the costuming to props in the background.
                If your goal is to see a thought provoking film, with a great cast, and fine craftsmanship Terry Gilliam’s The Zero Theorem (2013) is the film for you. Sadly my previous sentence sends many movie goers running for the hills and I can’t blame them. When you have the stress and aggravation of kids, debt, etc. it’s nice to switch of your brain and watch Sly Stallone and his band of expendables blow up a small village in Eastern Europe. I am confident that Z.T. will find a new lease on life on DVD with high school and college students on hallucinogens.
3 out of 5 Python Feet.  RECOMMEND 
 by Jacob Cohen